The member photo gallery is now integrated and live!!  All user albums and pictures have been ported from old gallery.


To register send an e-mail to admin@bmwr65.org and provide your location and desired user name.

Author Topic: Fuel additives  (Read 2003 times)

Offline jamestnewsonr65

  • Lives in Foothills of Mt. Olympus
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Fuel additives
« on: March 29, 2015, 07:39:52 AM »
Now that I am using the bike again and took it out for it's first run this year, it occurred to me that I might need to use a fuel additive due to the unleaded fuel used.

Does anyone else use additives in their fuel to ensure the valves are not damaged over time? Or is it something which I don't need to worry about.
1983 R65LS completely refurbished to my liking.
1985 R80 nearly stock rebuild (basically new bike).
1981 R65 (box of bits).

Offline montmil

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 8371
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2015, 08:02:04 AM »
IMO, these fuel additives do nothing for your engine and neither do they grow hair on your chest, remove it from your ears nor make you irresistible to hot babes.

At least that's been my limited personal experiences. ::)
Monte Miller
Denton, TEXAS
1978 BMW R100S
1981 BMW R65
1983 BMW R65
1995 Triumph Trophy
1986 VW Cabriolet

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2015, 10:51:52 AM »
I don't use fuel additive for the valve seats and I have seen zero valve recession due to unleaded fuel. Only time it might be a problem is if using maximum revs all the time.  

You might want to research BMW's change of valve material as their first attempt at coping with unleaded fuel caused more problems than it cured.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9124
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2015, 11:34:29 AM »
Don't waste your money on fuel additives, to replace lead .
The problem that BMW had with valve issues, as Barry has said, was the material the valve seats were made from .
No amount of lead would solve this problem .
Unleaded fuel became mandatory in the US around 1972-73, don't know when it became mandatory in the EU community, I have not heard of any real issues with valve problems here in the US due to unleaded fuel .
Possibly vehicles manufactured before 1972-73 may have in issues, but by far a vast majority of the those vehicles have long been recycled .
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

Offline jamestnewsonr65

  • Lives in Foothills of Mt. Olympus
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2015, 01:43:25 PM »
Seems the general consensus is don't bother and if there is an issue it is not because of the fuel.

Seems that some things cope ok without additives in place of the lead. I have a 1969 Porsche which copes brilliantly without any lead additive whatsoever.

Thanks for the replies.

1983 R65LS completely refurbished to my liking.
1985 R80 nearly stock rebuild (basically new bike).
1981 R65 (box of bits).

Offline Tony Smith

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 2331
  • Graduate, Wallace and Gromit School of Engineering
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2015, 04:39:18 PM »
Quote
IMO, these fuel additives do nothing for your engine and neither do they grow hair on your chest, remove it from your ears nor make you irresistible to hot babes.

At least that's been my limited personal experiences. ::)


+1

But on the theory that like chicken soup it can't hurt, I do drop a splash of "Flash-Lube valve saver" in with every tankfull (when I remember).


My own research on BMW airhead valve recession tells me that some do, some do not and the year of manufacture has bugger all to do with it. I monitor my valve clearances and if I suffer a receding seat I will fit another cylinder head and try my luck again. i will only muck about fitting "lead free" seats when the supply of cheap usable heads runs out.
1978 R100RS| 1981 R100RS (JPS) | 1984 R65 | 1992 KLE500 | 2002 R1150GSA |

Offline mrclubike

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Jungheinrich Master Tech
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2015, 07:05:24 PM »
I have not had any noticeable valve seat wear on mine after 3000 miles  :D
1982 R65 running tubeless Snowflakes
2004 R1150R

cwmoss

  • Guest
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2015, 08:41:27 AM »
What about the additives for dealing with the ethanol?

Offline montmil

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 8371
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2015, 12:07:08 PM »
Quote
What about the additives for dealing with the ethanol?

Can't speak for others, but the five motorcycles in my garage -the Airheads being 1978, 1981, 1983- and my old VW Cabriolet show no ill effects from the approx 10% +/- blend of ethanol with the gasoline... other than a slight decrease in gas mileage. Nor are there any issues with the floats and rubber bits in das Bings.

Monte Miller
Denton, TEXAS
1978 BMW R100S
1981 BMW R65
1983 BMW R65
1995 Triumph Trophy
1986 VW Cabriolet

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2015, 12:09:08 PM »
There are some good reasons to be careful using a range of additives with ethanol fuel blends as the additives may contain alcohol which potentially makes any problems due to ethanol worse not better.  
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

wa1udg

  • Guest
Re: Fuel additives
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2015, 07:32:43 PM »
i don't believe in snake oil but I have found that Lucas fuel treatment keeps the floats free on my Bings and my occasional "Bingfoot" problem was eliminated.  It also leaves a film which may help with tank rust during storage.  There are eough moving parts in a Bing that the stuff can't hurt.