Years ago, I gave a hard life to 3 consecutive boxers

The first two lived on dinosaur oil, 20 w 50 (duckhams Q) as reccomended for the local climate. At around 65K bores and valves were badly worn on both (genuine mileage on one, at least). The third boxer lived on synthetic 5 w 40 (Mobil 1). I was very interested to see if synthetic was worth the cost, so before selling the third at 50K, I pulled the heads to examine the wear. The bores were fantastic, lovely all round matt with even honing marks, couldnt be better and the valves were great too.
Were I a politician, representing government or trying to con you in some other way, I'd leave the story there. But there is of course more to it all.
The third boxer was an 81 R65 with Nikasil bores. The first two R80 and R100RS, iron bores. Like all good experiments there's comparability to be considered. The R65 had to work harder with the early morning motorway runs and slightly slower day time ones and the two up European touring

. All bikes had the same mix of work and 5K oil changes.
Just a bit more evidence for the debate :-/.
Synthetic sump oil always feels more slippery between the fingers than dino, I think.
I'm currently using dino on a short term ownership R65 which isn't used daily. Next airhead will be a Nikasil bore R100

and I'll run it on synthetic.