Why an R65? Tell you why I got one:
In 1971 I bought an R60/5 - my first brand-new bike and as it turned out, to this day the worst motorcycle I have ever owned. I will not waste half a page on it but I did resolve at the time, never another BMW, whether on 2 wheels or 4.
But last year I bought a 1979 R65. Well, I thought maybe I should forget my prejudice, after nearly 40 years. But also, being retired an oilhead was out of my budget. Could have bought a used one, but a) a matter of personal taste, I think oilheads are disgusting-looking bikes, a load of components thrown together with no sense of style and producing something suitable for riding by Judge Dredd, or maybe Terminator. Not my scene at all.
Also b) from reading up I know that the oilheads have a long lasting reputation for failures in the electronics: engines will not start, alarms triggered by filling-station security systems, and so on. Not so good.
But the R65 is of great interest in part because in this country anyway, it is still a cause of controversy although it is many years since the last was made. Some say it is a really good all-round bike, ok for anything except high-speed crazy riding, others say it is the worst bike ever made by BMW. Also, and like most airheads, it is beautiful to look at, well styled by a designer who knew his business. And in Britain, anyway, it is not well regarded as a classic, which means a good one will not cost much to buy. My lovely 79 came in at £1,500 which I believe is a little under $2,000.
My R65 is pretty close to the perfect bike for a grandpa! Too bad I didn’t investigate them earlier...
Would anyone else like to give their reasons for riding R65?