The member photo gallery is now integrated and live!!  All user albums and pictures have been ported from old gallery.


To register send an e-mail to admin@bmwr65.org and provide your location and desired user name.

Author Topic: Cylinder Position  (Read 2552 times)

Offline Air4Life

  • Lives in Foothills of Mt. Olympus
  • **
  • Posts: 206
  • With each added mile I enjoy it more.
Cylinder Position
« on: July 26, 2012, 03:17:08 PM »
Does anyone know why the left was designed forward of the right, I assume earth rotation and political leanings have nothing to do with it?  More room for the shifting foot is one plus.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2012, 03:17:34 PM by Air4Life »
sold:
1983 33.8 E. Oil & Trans ?
Batt 10/06/2011
33.2 Head 35.5 (I0.005) ?(E0.009) 35.5
RearT 35.5 Spline 7/12 &
T.O.Bearing
C.U. Paste 5/12

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5142
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2012, 03:27:08 PM »
Quote
More room for the shifting foot is one plus.  

Can't think of a better reason.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9121
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2012, 03:28:18 PM »
I believe it's because the connecting rods have different bosses on the crankshaft, one is in front of the other .


http://www.realoem.com/bmw/showparts.do?model=0364&mospid=51897&btnr=11_1716&hg=11&fg=21
« Last Edit: July 26, 2012, 03:32:03 PM by Bob_Roller »
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5142
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2012, 05:09:01 PM »
The crankshaft having separate big end journals is of course why the cylinders are staggered but given that they are staggered I thought the question was why choose the left cylinder to be forward of the right. It could have been the other way around.

It would have been possible to have the cylinders in lie using a forked conrod design like Harley V twins but that's more complicated.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2012, 05:10:17 PM by bhodgson »
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline Air4Life

  • Lives in Foothills of Mt. Olympus
  • **
  • Posts: 206
  • With each added mile I enjoy it more.
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2012, 06:07:50 PM »
Bob's factual reply had me rethink my initial post.  I thought, like you Barry, that it was a reply as to how the contraption is what it is.

However, my original intent was, how did the designers decide to place the left in front of the right?  Was it a convention of sorts, functionality, or simply chance?  

In the same vein, why did God make designer's responsible for the size bell bottom jeans? ;D
sold:
1983 33.8 E. Oil & Trans ?
Batt 10/06/2011
33.2 Head 35.5 (I0.005) ?(E0.009) 35.5
RearT 35.5 Spline 7/12 &
T.O.Bearing
C.U. Paste 5/12

Offline montmil

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 8371
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2012, 08:35:35 AM »
BMW Airheads, air-cooled flat-4 VWs, Continental, Lycoming aircraft engines, etc...  Engineers have yet to figure out how two connecting rods can share the same crankshaft journal without using a forked rod.

Original design decisions for the Airhead may have to do with the gearbox and driveshaft orientation. Let's go ask Snowbum. He's probably got a 2500-word treatise on the subject.

Several observant, non-gearhead peeps that have spent a little time around my Airheads ask the same question.    
Monte Miller
Denton, TEXAS
1978 BMW R100S
1981 BMW R65
1983 BMW R65
1995 Triumph Trophy
1986 VW Cabriolet

Offline Air4Life

  • Lives in Foothills of Mt. Olympus
  • **
  • Posts: 206
  • With each added mile I enjoy it more.
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2012, 10:11:55 AM »
That's interesting you should indicate that about "non-gearhead peeps" making that comment.  For me the bike has never been very attractive to look at; however, I do like that little engine, on many levels.   I would never pretend that there wasn't a certain aesthetic seduction coming from having them cylinders hanging out there.

Off topic I know, but I thought it important to disclose my true feelings. :D
sold:
1983 33.8 E. Oil & Trans ?
Batt 10/06/2011
33.2 Head 35.5 (I0.005) ?(E0.009) 35.5
RearT 35.5 Spline 7/12 &
T.O.Bearing
C.U. Paste 5/12

tvrla

  • Guest
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2012, 10:32:16 AM »
The bell bottoms question isn't in the same league at all!

Another possibility - since most of us get on and off from the left side, perhaps it had something to do with having more room over there.

This probably was something carried over from before the first BMW motorcycle, when they were building engines for those other bikes. Remember, Max Fritz adapted the engine they were already selling to other bike manufacturers.

And the first ones had hand shift, so the idea of having more room for the shifter doesn't fit. Or maybe it does - maybe it gave more room for the hand shifter.

Is it the same with the VW boxers? Left side forward of the right?
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 10:34:22 AM by tvrla »

Offline Justin B.

  • Administrator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 5983
  • I love my Beemers
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2012, 07:23:34 PM »
Quote
For me the bike has never been very attractive to look at

I remember buying my first BMW in 1976 and thinking it a very odd looking bird and a bit homely.  Over the years they've grown on me and I don't feel comfortable on anything else...
Justin B.

2004 BMW R1150RT
1981 R100RT - Summer bike, NEKKID!!!

JPSpen

  • Guest
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2012, 10:09:22 AM »
I bet the decision went like this...

Eenie Meanie Miney, MO....

John

markrennick

  • Guest
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2012, 07:23:27 AM »
Quote
I remember buying my first BMW in 1976 and thinking it a very odd looking bird and a bit homely

I remember seeing police bikes back in the 70s, before I was old enough for a moped.. gawking at the big cylinders. And the magic numbers on the side panel (six HUNDRED ccs!!)

Must have made a big impression on me, & I still love the look. Although the crankcase was odd looking. I used to think it was called a boxer because the engine was hidden in a box!

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5142
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #11 on: August 01, 2012, 11:53:22 AM »
Until I owned an airhead I hadn't noticed the extent to which the cylinders were staggered. I don't recall any casual observers noticing until I point it out, then they are surprised by how quirky the layout is.  I suspect many who have ridden an airhead for the first time don't notice straight away.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline montmil

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 8371
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2012, 06:45:21 PM »
Old Hippies and New Agers rebuilding their vintage VW air-cooled engines sure know about it.

Boxers Forever!
Monte Miller
Denton, TEXAS
1978 BMW R100S
1981 BMW R65
1983 BMW R65
1995 Triumph Trophy
1986 VW Cabriolet

tvrla

  • Guest
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2012, 09:17:00 AM »
I owned the R90 for two years before noticing the left foot peg was farther forward than the right side. How weird is that???

These bikes give an impression of being symetrical, but it's ONLY an apparency!

Offline marcmax

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Any day on two wheels is a good day
Re: Cylinder Position
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2012, 02:18:11 PM »
I knew the cylinder were slightly staggered but I never noticed the footpegs were until I read this. I just went into the garage to check and can't believe I never noticed after all the mile I have put on it.
Keep your bike in good repair: motorcycle boots are not comfortable for walking.

1982 R65ls    1984 R65ls