continued - (premature emailiation) line around their circumference, I'd be having new seats fitted anyway.
You may find that the cost of equalising the two heads (if required) is less than the cost of buying another head.
That said, there are places around the globe where there are more BMW wreckers than the North-Eastern bit of Australia and it may be that if you go to one of those wreckers they will sell you a pair that are a 100% match for a small premium on top of taking yours as exchange.
I did go through this with my own heads, only to discover that in addition to having been "flowed", they had larger, non-bmw valves fitted, along with non-bmw valve seats which my machine shop was able to match with good quality replacements from Intervalve. What they were not able to tell me was whether or not my valve seats were suitable for unleaded fuel - but around 8,000 miles on the clock suggests that they probably are.
I guess what I'm saying in a nutshell is that without knowing the standard measurements and factoring in that you can't know what has been done to components in their 35 to 40 year journey into your hands, so you have to measure and compare.
My last comment, I may be wrong but I have always understood the de-rating of the R65's horsepower for certain markets was achieved by restrictors in the inlet tract and minor jetting changes. I think that this is true as anything else would have simply cost BMW too much on a per-unit basis for it to be worth their while to do as changing things like cams, pistons, valves etc. would have given them another product line to support with spares etc. As far as I know only the Japanese have ever enjoyed the product volume to make that work, but for the most part when they bring out a de-rated model (for example for the LAMs (Learner Approved Motorcycle) program in Australia) they use restrictor plates and changes in fueling to do so, and only very rarely do they make other changes between the "learner" and "full strength" models.