The member photo gallery is now integrated and live!!  All user albums and pictures have been ported from old gallery.


To register send an e-mail to admin@bmwr65.org and provide your location and desired user name.

Author Topic: Clutch bolt torque  (Read 1867 times)

AlfromNH

  • Guest
Clutch bolt torque
« on: March 10, 2014, 06:46:57 AM »
My Clymer manual list "Clutch Housing Cover Bolts" torque spec at 23nm / 17ft/lbs. I bought 6 new bolts and wave washers.

Just by feel, that torque seems excessive for these relatively small bolts, and somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to recall reading that it was considered too high a value. Am I imaging that? Is that the correct torque?

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2014, 09:50:02 AM »
17ftlbs does seem a lot but 16 - 17ftlbs is the BMW specified  figure for the early models including R65 (I checked my BMW workshop manual) and 15 - 16 ft lbs after 81.  They have been known to be wrong though and Snowbum does suggest 7.5 ftlbs.

I would check the size against a standard 8.8 bolts torque chart.  If they are 8mm bolts the 15 - 16 would be OK, if the bolts are 6 mm then that would be too much and  7.5 is probably correct.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 10:00:40 AM by bhodgson »
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline steve hawkins

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
  • Lighter, Faster, where's me hacksaw!
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2014, 11:25:35 AM »
Yes it is wrong and you will snap them if you use this torque.  This erroneous value has also found its way into the Haynes manual as well.

You were right to ask.  Bullet dodged.

If only I had managed to dodge it as well, the first time I change my clutch.
 >:(
Rev. light
Steve Hawkins R100 (that wants to be an R65)

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2014, 12:46:10 PM »
Quote
That torque is too high. 7.5 ft/lbs (w/ blue loctite) is the figure I have seen specified for the 79-80 R65 clutch bolts

Just out of interest did you get that 7.5ftlbs figure from Snowbum's site or is it available somewhere else ? What ever it seems you remembered correctly.  

Is it the case that R65's have smaller bolts than type 247 airheads and that is the explanation for the higher figure being most often quoted.  No surprise that Clymers and Haynes have it wrong s they will have copied the BMW manual.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

AlfromNH

  • Guest
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2014, 05:10:19 PM »
Thanks guys, I'm glad I asked.

So now that I torqued them to 20+, should I be concerned about them being stretched or otherwise stressed, or just leave them be?

I'm afraid it'll eat at me unless I change 'em... unless someone can convince me otherwise. :-/

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9124
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2014, 05:50:53 PM »
Does anyone know the bolt diameter and thread pitch ?
I've got a table for standard torques in the BMW shop manual that I have .
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

AlfromNH

  • Guest
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2014, 07:09:14 PM »
The bolts are m6x1.0, Bob

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9124
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2014, 07:47:04 PM »
The chart shows an M6 bolt, 8.8 grade, 6.5 foot pounds .

Doesn't indicate the thread pitch on the chart, just bolt diameter for this size .

To me, that sounds a bit low for this application, threading a steel bolt into a steel flywheel .

But what do I know !!! :D
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 07:49:31 PM by Bob_Roller »
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

AlfromNH

  • Guest
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2014, 07:53:14 PM »
Thanks for the info, Bob. That's about 8.8nm. Considering I have them at better than 20nm, I'm very lucky not to have done any damage. I think I'll get some new bolts  :o

Offline Tony Smith

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 2331
  • Graduate, Wallace and Gromit School of Engineering
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2014, 09:02:13 PM »
Quote
So now that I torqued them to 20+, should I be concerned about them being stretched or otherwise stressed, or just leave them be? :-/

Well, and you probably aren't going to want to hear this. Given that whatever torque value you have imparted to the bolts, they are equal and didn't break int he process, I would leave them the hell alone now as to do anything else invites their total replacement.

What I would do is have a long hard look at your torque wrench. If it was expensive and looks to have adjustment points, I'd be taking it to a good tool shop to have it correctly adjusted (or do it myself if I could figure out how).

If it was a cheap one, or is non-adjustable it correct placement is in the nearest bin, or sent anonymously to a BMW owner you do not like.

It is reading way under correct spec, an M6 bolt is broken long before it gets to 20ft/lbs, an M8 would be marginal.

In fact if I recall correctly the general engineering recommendation (and I am at work and therefore operating on memory) is around 7.5ft/lbs for an M6 and 11ft/lbs for an M8, assuming both are 1mm thread pitch, general grade bright mild. You could add 50% more for high tensile steel and double for titanium.
 
Now there is a thought, a long time ago a dumb mate of mine who worked in aerospace thought it would be really cool to replace all the M4 and M6 Cap screws in in his Yamaha engine covers with titanium cap screws purloined from work. Shame he didn't use any thread lubricant and an even bigger shame that was about 2 years before he had to try to remove any of them.
 
Given that this was an XS750 and at the time replacement engines were neither hard to find or expensive, he gave the old girl a birthday with a later model XS850 engine as that seemed cheaper than paying to have the 4 bolts he broke trying to undo and their remaining 20 or so cousins electrically eroded in an attempt to save his existing engine covers.
1978 R100RS| 1981 R100RS (JPS) | 1984 R65 | 1992 KLE500 | 2002 R1150GSA |

Offline nhmaf

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 5156
  • Free at last, Free at last!
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2014, 10:32:53 PM »
Indeed, the torque figure for the EARLIER model R65 (79-80) clutch assembly bolts has been incorrectly spec'ed in various places as the same value for the 81-later clutch carrier bolts, and this is often the cause of woe and wailing.   As pointed out, the earlier clutch assembly used smaller diameter bolts, and the 7 ft-lbs for the M6 bolts and no more than 15 fts-lbs for the M8 bolts should be used... this  info sourced from snowbum and Oak, and Ted Porter.

If you cinched your M6 bolts up to 15 ft-lbs (or M8 bolts to 20_ft lbs) and they didn't snap off already, they might not snap for a very long time, but if you do ever go back in there I'd be sure to replace all those bolts with new ones at the proper torque setting.
Airhead #12178 ? BMWMOA #123173 ?BMWRA #33525 ?GSBMWR #563 ?1982 BMW R65LS ?1978 BMW R100/7 1998 Kawasaki Concours

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2014, 04:33:32 AM »
Here's a chart I use with the M6 figures highlighted for black and zinc plated bolts. If the black finished bolts are oiled threads I would reduce torque by 15%.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

AlfromNH

  • Guest
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2014, 05:55:12 AM »
Tony: I was talking in nm, not ft/lbs. So 20nm = ~15ft/lbs.  I'm still fortunate they didn't break tho!

My torque wrench is a fairly new Craftsman. Certainly not aerospace-spec, but I think it's trustworthy.  :-/

The engine is back in the frame, but the tranny isn't installed yet, so I'm going to replace the bolts before I go any further.

Offline georgesgiralt

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1388
  • I Love YaBB 2!
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2014, 10:22:23 AM »
Hello !
as far as I know, on post 81 bikes, the bolts are M7 allen. And they are stretched on torquing so need replacement every time they are removed.
I did not dismantle a clutch in a long time so I may be miss-remembering ...

Offline Luca

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Taking my time as quick as I can
Re: Clutch bolt torque
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2014, 05:59:56 PM »
But he's got a '79
'82 R65LS
'01 K1200RS