The member photo gallery is now integrated and live!!  All user albums and pictures have been ported from old gallery.


To register send an e-mail to admin@bmwr65.org and provide your location and desired user name.

Author Topic: Sorry... tires  (Read 3513 times)

CaptainSlow

  • Guest
Sorry... tires
« on: February 27, 2013, 03:58:16 AM »
I've done a search but surprisingly didn't find much on tires, please humour me if there is a section that I've missed!

So, I've noticed that the date stamps on the tires fitted to my R65 show that I need to replace them regardless of their lack of wear - they're dated 2000 or earlier! I'm thinking along the lines of the Avon Roadrider as motorcycle couriers over here seem to rate them highly.

I have two questions - firstly, the sizes. As mine is an LS and has the wider front rim, the front should be a 100/90-18 ? And the rear a 120/90-18 ?

Secondly, these are tubeLESS tyres. I've contacted Avon and they  said that you can use these tyres with tubes, but they wouldn't be drawn on tube sizes - is anyone on here doing this, or can you give me the correct size tubes?

Many thanks!

bruce_launceston

  • Guest
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2013, 04:43:58 AM »
Hi Sam, you will need a 100/90 front and a 110/90 rear as it is limited by the swingarm clearance. You can run them tubeless on LS rims.
Personally I recommend Bridgestone BT45's. excellent grip and long life.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2013, 05:01:37 AM by bruce_launceston »

CaptainSlow

  • Guest
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2013, 06:45:27 AM »
Thats fantastic news about running tubeless, thanks Bruce. Rear size noted as well. I had the BT45s listed as a second choice, so I guess it'll depend upon prices at the end of the day - they both seem to have excellent reviews.

Thanks for the help once again. If you need help with a Land Rover Discovery Td5 I'm your man, but I'm an utter novice on the R65...  :-[

Offline montmil

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 8371
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2013, 08:07:29 AM »
Quote
... You can run them tubeless on LS rims...

If you decide to go tubeless, remember to factor in the price of a pair of tubeless valve stems. I like the "angled" stems on my R65. Much easier to get an air chuck on the rascals. [smiley=thumbup.gif]

Prior to mounting the new tires, confirm the rims have no burrs, spurs or boogers. Tubeless tires have a much stronger bead than non-tubies. If you plan a DIY mount and balance, keep young ears away from the shop and maintain a good supply of malt beverages.
Monte Miller
Denton, TEXAS
1978 BMW R100S
1981 BMW R65
1983 BMW R65
1995 Triumph Trophy
1986 VW Cabriolet

jgp1854

  • Guest
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2013, 08:10:54 AM »
Greetings from the US.  My 82 LS have the OEM "white" wheels, and in replacing the tires.  MAX's BMW and METZLER's site, show the front to be

90.90x18 front
4.00x18 rear

When I acquired the LS the front had 100 x 18, when I freshened them up  I used the smaller (OEM) size, the handling is better IMO.  I used tubes in mine, for no other reason than it had them when I acquired it.  It is nice to know the LS wheels DONOT need tubes.

jgp

Offline georgesgiralt

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1388
  • I Love YaBB 2!
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2013, 08:42:09 AM »
Hello !
Actually, LS wheels are NOT tubeless rims.
So the tire will NOT be properly seated and can escape the rim !
The manufacturer did not certify these rims for tubeless use. So you have to put a tube into them otherwise you risk a brutal pressure failure  if you run them totally tubeless.
I do not know what they where thinking at BMW at the time with these rims !
At the same time Michelin in France issued a set of special tires which had to be used on special rims. Citroën used them on some cars. If you still have the car, you can't use them because Michelin does not make these tires any more and no other tires fit the rims.... Unless you find standard rims and pay for the certification process...

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9125
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2013, 08:56:57 AM »
Here's an  article from Snowbum's BMW site .

It doesn't specifically mention the LS wheels, but the monoshock bikes had the same wheel as the LS .

Hope it doesn't confuse you any more than it needs to  !!!!

http://bmwmotorcycletech.info/section6.htm


Here's a BMW service letter that has the description of the LS wheels, which are referred to as 'composite' wheels .

https://www.bmwmc.net/catalog/2044.pdf





« Last Edit: February 27, 2013, 09:06:33 AM by Bob_Roller »
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2013, 12:38:24 PM »
Last time I changed the tires I took a picture of the rim profile for future reference.  This illustrates the lack of an obvious bump in the profile before the drop into the well.  There is no doubt that these rims were not designed for tubeless tires however some have run tubeless without incident and apparently safely for many many years. For those who are considering doing so I recall BMW themselves described these as safety rims due to the wide seating area and relatively narrow well. The well on the front rim is particularly narrow.

This rims may not be certified to run tubeless but I believe they are safer than early spoked wheels.  You only have to experience the difficulty of breaking the bead and dismounting a tire to know that.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2013, 12:39:37 PM by bhodgson »
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline Lucky_Lou

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 2699
  • shoot first
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2013, 01:31:20 PM »
I note that your in Yorkshire, National Tyres in Barnsley are bike specialists I run Michelin MT45,s nice retro look to them and good handling  i am calling in there tomorrow for an opinion on my K front wheel which looks like its bent............. seems Avon Roadmasters dont like Diesel
Lou
« Last Edit: February 27, 2013, 01:33:18 PM by Lucky_Lou »
Ask questions later

CaptainSlow

  • Guest
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2013, 02:49:13 AM »
Hi Lou, yes I used to use that depot when I had the Guzzi, they are very helpful. Sorry to hear about your K having some excitement, luckily thats something I've never had to deal with. I take it you are ok?

I thought I'd ask about the tyres here first though as the LS wheels seem to be unique and I'm not sure National Tyres would know anything about them. I've contacted Rainbow BMW to ask their opinion so I'll write back here with what they suggest. My initial thought is to go tubeless with the RoadRiders, however that *may* affect any possible future insurance claim - you know how insurers will use anything to get out of a payout!

George - I had one of those Citroens! It was a CX 2.5GTi Turbo and had a unique Michelin metric TRX tyre - they were incredibly expensive and only available to special order! It was a superb car though, not as complex as many people make out, but still quite a challenge to work on due to all the special tools needed. I sold it as my licence was being seriously endangered - it was an absolute hoot to drive   :)

bruce_launceston

  • Guest
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2013, 03:57:28 AM »
LS wheels are unique to the R65LS, although similar to the later Monoshock wheel rims they are not the same.

Although BMW never say that the LS rims are 'Tubeless' my tyre technician inspected my rims and confirmed that they do have the correct profile to safely run tubeless tyres without needing tubes.

A number of paragraphs in the original sales brochure refer specifically to the new wheel technology and includes a diagram which shows the tyre (apparently without a tube) located in the required extra lips in the wheel well profile.

I have run without tubes for 25 years on these rims without any issues.

Barry, just to be clear the wheel rim photo you have posted is a snowflake from your R45, not a LS wheel?
« Last Edit: February 28, 2013, 04:16:55 AM by bruce_launceston »

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2013, 06:45:35 AM »
Quote
Barry, just to be clear the wheel rim photo you have posted is a snowflake from your R45, not a LS wheel?  


Yes it's a Snowflake rear.

Sorry I missed the fact that the original poster was talking about LS wheels.

I've never seen that diagram before and I have an original 82LS brochure.  It would certainly be enough evidence for me to run tubeless and it also shows the composite wheel constuction nicley.

It's interesting that all tubless wheel profiles slope down toward the well so they really do need the hump where as the snowflake profile is dead level. I wonder if that's because the air seal is meant to be on the bottom of the bead rather than the side.  That would explain how they mange to make tubeless spoked wheels work or are they more like this construction.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2013, 06:57:06 AM by bhodgson »
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Dizerens5

  • Guest
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2013, 07:03:36 AM »
Regarding Montmil's post - right-angle valve caps are (or used to be) available. I have them on my 79, see photo. They don't seem heavy enough to affect wheel balance, at least not at the grand-dad speeds I go at. I bought them some years ago from a company here called Sound Distribution. Don't know if they still stock them.

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9125
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2013, 07:51:19 AM »
BMW has the 90 degree valve stem extensions if you can't find them elsewhere .

Take this for what it's worth, not my comment, that the 90 degree valve extensions are for servicing only, not to be left on while riding .

Maybe not so much in the R65 application, but where there is a rubber portion of the valve stem that protrudes past the  jamnut, can cause valve stem failure .

A co-worker has a late model Honda sport bike, he had a valve stem failure at 70 mph, due to the 90 degree extension being installed all the time
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Sorry... tires
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2013, 10:34:50 AM »
I have one of those right angle valve extensions that came with the bike tool kit.  Never needed to use it though.

I believe it must cause a small out of balance force so I wouldn't leave it on.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45