The member photo gallery is now integrated and live!!  All user albums and pictures have been ported from old gallery.


To register send an e-mail to admin@bmwr65.org and provide your location and desired user name.

Author Topic: valve recession  (Read 2559 times)

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9125
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: valve recession
« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2012, 08:19:13 AM »
These airhead engines also don't have any valve guide seals, like most  engines .
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

Offline steve hawkins

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1347
  • Lighter, Faster, where's me hacksaw!
Re: valve recession
« Reply #16 on: December 19, 2012, 02:36:48 AM »
30,000 miles is kinda low for top end rebuild.

I wish the inside of my rocker covers was as clean as that.

Enjoy your ride.

Rev. Light
Steve Hawkins R100 (that wants to be an R65)

livingdeadhead

  • Guest
Re: valve recession
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2012, 11:36:04 AM »
no valve seals? is that how my sump was filled with petrol on delivery? also if 65 is riding hard (ive blown an rd 250 and a zx10 in the past) have i picked the right bike?

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: valve recession
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2012, 12:15:11 PM »
There are no oil seals fitted to the valve guides although the occasional enterprising owner has managed to find some car seals that fit. No info on what they were.

Absence of valve guide seals has nothing to do with petrol in the sump. More likely to have been the result of parking up with the fuel tap open.

An R65 is happy enough being revved but oil consumption is always going to increase at sustained high speeds. Might be a good idea to check the engine breather is working OK as that is important to control oil consumption at high revs.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2012, 12:19:03 PM by bhodgson »
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline Matt Chapter

  • Lives at Base of Mt. Olympus
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
  • <insert witty remark here>
Re: valve recession
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2012, 02:10:20 PM »
Quote
also if 65 is riding hard (ive blown an rd 250 and a zx10 in the past) have i picked the right bike?

well, the R65 is no ZX, but I've had mine up to the redline in top gear.  The trick is good maintenance, and an understanding of how the bike likes to be treated.  I'm up to 49xxx miles now.  I have an '86 chasis with an '84 motor, and I would guarantee it goes over 6k on the tach every time it goes out on the road.  In fact, I rarely ride it below 4k.. not very much oomph below about 3500 rpms.
'04 R1150 RT ~41000 miles
'86 R65 / '84 motor ~72000 miles. SS lines, Spiegler rotor, Progressive monoshock, Keihan silencers, a piece of Pichler fairing.
'76 CB400F ~26000 miles. non-runner!

livingdeadhead

  • Guest
Re: valve recession
« Reply #20 on: December 20, 2012, 02:18:01 PM »
nah, i'm not going to thrash it or neglect it! but i do want to use all its performance , i had a bsa a65.....i think (hope) i've got silly speeds out of my system now, mind you i've said that before , and i loved my sportster, if i haven't theres lots of old sports bikes , cheap!