Barry & all,
I'm in the process of identifying and accurately archiving absolute TDC. Why go to all this trouble? I'll try to keep this short...I'm currently doing some Beta testing for John Rayski at EME for the Enduralast and Electronic Ignition system being developed. I discovered my past interpretation of view angle through the case window to the flywheel for static and dynamic timing may have been in error. I've discovered it's quite easy to accumulate a 3° to 5° error depending on what the individual may interpret as radial or perpendicular to the case notch and flywheel marking. Moving on; I am going to go through the procedure of determining absolute TDC by use of a degree wheel and piston stop tool. The procedure is rotating the engine cw to stop record degree wheel reading, then ccw to stop and record this degree wheel reading. Then by finding the mean or mid-point of these readings equals absolute TDC. At this point I will identify the case notch and the flywheel OT index mark. The rub is; there is only 2 points of reference, the case notch and flywheel mark. To be accurate another or 3rd reference mark needs to be established. Remember 2 points define a line which is a dynamic view based on your eye position and 3 points define a plane which is my target result. I have a few ideas of including a pointer or additional case mark to fulfill the 3 point reference idea. I have a special piston stop tool ordered from Summit Racing I will utilize. Anal? Maybe BUT, once absolute TDC can be accurately referenced I will have a strong baseline and initial point of reference to correctly adjust valves, static timing and full advance timing. Sorry, that was the short version. I'll keep you guys advised of the procedure and results unless you find this an exercise in minutia.
My reason for asking the question originally is to see if anyone else has experienced the frustration of view angle for timing and valve adjustment and your resolutions.