The member photo gallery is now integrated and live!!  All user albums and pictures have been ported from old gallery.


To register send an e-mail to admin@bmwr65.org and provide your location and desired user name.

Author Topic: Do our bikes need tubes?  (Read 1756 times)

Red_Hen

  • Guest
Do our bikes need tubes?
« on: December 25, 2009, 08:03:29 PM »
Greetings & Happy Holidays,

Getting close to replacing tires on my R65LS project . . . generally, mag wheels don't need tubes - would this be true for our bikes? If no tubes, I'll purchase new valve stems with the new tires.

Thanks,

Ken

Offline donbmw

  • Lives in Foothills of Mt. Olympus
  • **
  • Posts: 416
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2009, 08:54:11 PM »
The wheels on these bike were not made to be tube less. Have seen some run the with out tubes. I do run tube less tires but with tubes in them.

Don
1975 R90/6, 1980 R65, 1982 R65, 2015 Ural Patrol & 1959 Triumph TR3

bruce_launceston

  • Guest
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2009, 12:41:09 AM »
Hi Ken
I have been told by a motorcycle tyre expert who checked my 1984 R65LS rim that these rims have the required shape for tubeless tyres.
I have allways run my tyres tubeless untill recently when I fitted a front tube because of a persistant very slow leak, possibly caused by porousity of the alloy rim?
This topic has been covered before at some length with differing schools of thought, I am speaking of my own experience with the '84 LS rims backed by the knowledge of a motorcyclist working in the tyre industry.

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2009, 04:47:09 AM »
We all have our opinions on this one. I'm convinced to run tubless next time I run a tubless tire and I think it is at least as safe as running a tube with the added advantage of lower unsprung weight.

There has been a very good thread on boxerworks phorum recently. Look for "tube to tubless" in the General BMW discussion board.
http://www.boxerworks.com/message.php
« Last Edit: December 26, 2009, 04:50:01 AM by bhodgson »
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45

Offline Bob_Roller

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 9124
  • -7 hours GMT
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2009, 07:03:49 AM »
I got a bit of a surprise when I had new Metzeler tires mounted on my '84 LS in October .

When I came back to pick up the wheels, I was told they saved me some money, by not installing tubes .

First off, I was told that the previously mounted tires, had no tubes installed .

I was told also, that the wheel, had the proper 'profile' for tubeless tires .

If you do install tubes in an LS rim, due to the shape of the rim, you barely get enough valve stem protruding through the rim .

This is, what I think, is a major reason that tubes are not installed in these wheels .

The standard 'snowflake' rims need tubes, regardless what kind of tire you use .
« Last Edit: December 26, 2009, 07:05:17 AM by Bob_Roller »
'81 R65
'82 R65 LS
'84 R65 LS
'87 Moto Guzzi V65 Lario
'02 R1150R
Riding all year long since 1993 .
I'll give up my R65, when they pry my cold dead hands from the handlebars !!!!!

Red_Hen

  • Guest
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2009, 07:37:12 AM »
My '82 R65LS has the white snowflake rims.  Sounds like going tubeless is the way to go on mine.  That also means I should buy new valve stems too.


Thanks much, as always,


Ken



« Last Edit: December 26, 2009, 12:24:03 PM by Red_Hen »

Offline MrRiden

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 1291
  • R65LS Phoenix, Arizona
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #6 on: December 26, 2009, 03:23:34 PM »
Is there a part # for the vale stems required for tubeless installation?
"We can't stop here. This is bat country".

bruce_launceston

  • Guest
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2009, 07:45:30 PM »
Hi Ken, I think you will find that when people refer to 'snowflake' wheels they mean the basic R65 type, not the more simple 10 spoke LS type that should be on your 82 LS. On the early LS's they were painted white, by '84 they were silver.

Cheers Bruce

Offline Rob Valdez 79 R65

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 96
  • I Love YaBB 2!
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2009, 05:49:59 PM »
Quote
Is there a part # for the vale stems required for tubeless installation?

If it were me, I would look for the highest-quality stem I could find, regardless of cost.

The valve stem issue was covered in a BMWON article a couple of years back.

Offline nhmaf

  • Global Moderator
  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • *****
  • Posts: 5156
  • Free at last, Free at last!
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2009, 05:27:09 PM »
Any airhead I've had which didn't have the K-bike inspired tubeless wheels - which first appeared on the mono-shock bikes for the 85/86 model year - I run with tubes.  This includes my 1982 R65LS with the LS-specific wheels (tubes installed).   Getting Metzler tubes, and NOT leaving the extra nut on the inside of the wheel rim (which I believe many folks incorrectly do) leaves enough valve stem sticking out the rim to work with air hoses quite readily, I find.

Airhead #12178 ? BMWMOA #123173 ?BMWRA #33525 ?GSBMWR #563 ?1982 BMW R65LS ?1978 BMW R100/7 1998 Kawasaki Concours

Darwin_R65

  • Guest
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2009, 05:16:29 AM »
Installed riht angle adaptors onto my valve stems today, much easier at service stations to pump up the tyres.

Offline Barry

  • Mt. Olympus Resident
  • ****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Do our bikes need tubes?
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2009, 06:00:50 AM »
I keep one of those right angle adaptors in the tool kit for when I need it.
I manage Ok at home without it and don't leave it on incase it affects wheel balance.
Barry Cheshire, England 79 R45