The New And Improved Unofficial R65 Forum V2

Technical Discussion => Misc. Technical Discussion => Topic started by: Justin B. on August 15, 2009, 01:50:37 PM

Title: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 15, 2009, 01:50:37 PM
I just received my "care package" containing differential pressure sensors, op-amps, and other such bits of wizardry so I guess I'll drag out the 'scope and start breadboarding a test/prototype circuit for the "Twinmax" replacement.  Besides using a common DMM for the readout I'm also thinking about maybe a few LEDs...
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 15, 2009, 07:42:50 PM
I'm excited to see what you come up with!!

If you dont mind my asking what is your initial plan of attack?

Will it be an analog comparator? or ccp on an mcu?

Or would it be straight resistive measurement? or other?

The ability to adjust sensitivity and fast tracking would be nice.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 15, 2009, 09:09:01 PM
The final "black box" will just output a voltage that the user will monitor with their DMM.  I am using a pot on my test unit so I can set the "zero" point anywhere between 1 and 11 volts (using 12V supply) and usually set it at 5 volts.  When one side is lower pressure the voltage drops (below the zero setpoint)  and when the other side is lower the voltage rises above the setpoint.

This works fine on the bench so I will now need to get a chunk of perfboard and make a more portable one that I can hook up to a bike to see what the wild pulsing will do to it!  I'll probably need to use an RC network of some sorts to dampen or smooth the output of the transducer before it gets to the op-amp stage...
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 15, 2009, 09:20:15 PM
Now will this be a device that is used in the garage or will you be able to ride with it?

It would be awesome to tune with realtime feedback.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 15, 2009, 10:10:35 PM
Both. totally portable and will run off the vehicle battery instead of an internal battery.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 16, 2009, 10:31:46 AM
Excellent! Good luck with the prototyping.

I love to design with electronics and I do it a lot.
I used to go from breadboard to a pcb house like "pcb express" for my designs but the cost is extreme especially if it's a developement and you are constantly improving or expanding the design.

So to cut costs and because I am a true tinker-a-holic I got interested in CNC and designed and built my own actually 2 now and almost 3.

My first machine is a gantry style mill that I use for everything from isolation milling of PCB's to cutting RC airplane and helicopter parts to complex patterns that I then use with router table.
 I keep this machine in my home garage.

The second machine is a converted Enco brand round column milling machine and it is used for much larger metal work and precision repeated drilling keep that one out at the shop.

And I have a small (9 x 20) Jet lathe that I am slowly converting to CNC hopefully I'll get hat one going this winter (also in my garage).

If you prototype much it's well worth while and surprisingly easy to do.

Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 16, 2009, 05:28:07 PM
I went out to the garage and took some pictures of my cnc setup.

The first picture is the dust confinement box

The 2nd is inside ...the router head or spindle travels 24" x 48" and up about 6"

The 3rd picture is a standard blank pcb and the method is called isolation milling as the it cuts the traces in little islands.

That particular pcb is version 1 of my homemade Segway human transporter.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 17, 2009, 07:51:56 AM
That's pretty cool, I've been trying to con. err talk, Suraklyn into building a CNC router but so far no luck.  I have a small CNClathe (based on a Sherline, I think) that I play around with but nothing serious...
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Bengt_Phorqs on August 17, 2009, 10:48:12 AM
There are those of us that are less technically proficient but like to keep up with the dialog here.  For my edification what is "breadboarding", and what is a "DMM".  I understand a manometer and all the lathe/mill talk, but I'm just trying to follow where you're going with this.  

And, if you build it, will I want to buy one? :-/
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Bob_Roller on August 17, 2009, 12:05:46 PM
Bread-boarding, is the assembly of a prototype circuit board, it can be adjusted during assembly without using of solder joints, to solve any unforeseen problems , DMM is short for a digital multimeter .

If you see a term you don't recognize, go to wikipedia, and usually you can get a not overly technical explanation of the term or phrase .
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 17, 2009, 12:39:02 PM
Bob covered it...

I have the test circuit soldered together and maybe this coming weekend I'll finish putting it in a box (so it won't fall apart) and try it out on a "live" bike instead of a Mity-Vac.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Bengt_Phorqs on August 17, 2009, 12:52:34 PM
Thanks, I thought it might be something like that.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 17, 2009, 01:30:59 PM
I'm really curious about how the carbs react  (if different or not) under a real world load.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 17, 2009, 01:32:13 PM
The other thing that I'm really curious about is why does the idle rpm change from cold  to operating temp?

Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 17, 2009, 02:22:30 PM
Oil warms up and gets thinner, fuel vapor doesn't tend to "cling" to intake runner walls, lots of things contribute...
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: nhmaf on August 17, 2009, 07:55:17 PM
A few suggestions, in case you haven't already planned on them:

1) One of the 'flaws' in the Twinmax design - possibly they've improved the design lately, but as of several yhears ago they hadn't - was  that it used unregulated battery voltage in the device.   Thus, the error of the measurement was directly influenced by the variation in the battery voltage.   Thus, if you had a "weak" battery int he device, it wouldn't provide the same accuracy as a new battery.

2) Use a "Bridge" circuit design  to minimize component variations messing with your "zero".  I would feed the differential signal from the bridge into an op amp with relatively low gain, maybe just 1. You maybe better off doing the filtering of the first op-amp's output if you have to filter stuff, rather than having the filter circuit's components causing a potential imbalance to the differential input.  Then feed that output into another op amp circuit for more gain, etc.

If you are really interested, I've "acquired" a schematic that may be of interest to you.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 17, 2009, 08:34:49 PM
Quote
A few suggestions, in case you haven't already planned on them:

1) One of the 'flaws' in the Twinmax design - possibly they've improved the design lately, but as of several yhears ago they hadn't - was  that it used unregulated battery voltage in the device.   Thus, the error of the measurement was directly influenced by the variation in the battery voltage.   Thus, if you had a "weak" battery int he device, it wouldn't provide the same accuracy as a new battery.


I asked that earlier and he said it would be vehicle powered (good foresight methinks) If it's a low current design the system will never know it's there.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 17, 2009, 08:37:32 PM
Quote
A few suggestions, in case you haven't already planned on them:



2) Use a "Bridge" circuit design  to minimize component variations messing with your "zero".  I would feed the differential signal from the bridge into an op amp with relatively low gain, maybe just 1. You maybe better off doing the filtering of the first op-amp's output if you have to filter stuff, rather than having the filter circuit's components causing a potential imbalance to the differential input.  Then feed that output into another op amp circuit for more gain, etc.

If you are really interested, I've "acquired" a schematic that may be of interest to you.


Your saying a cascaded design for high selectivity and low error (noise)

I think this is a good approach too as it will track very fast.

Also I cant speak for Justin but I'd love to see your schematic ....is it your design?
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: nhmaf on August 17, 2009, 10:18:27 PM
Regulation is needed for "good" accuracy - this won't draw much current, but if the input voltage can vary from 11V to 13.5V, and one expects "12V" in the design, depending on the implementation of the design, one could introduce error of up to 5% or more.  But, depending on how accurate it needs to be versus the cost trade-offs...
maybe one person's "lousy" is "good enough for automotive work"!
 ;)

While I have designed things like this, I haven't done one JUST like it yet.  I do happen to have a schematic that is purported to be the same as that found in a commercial unit.   A quick glance at it appears to indicate that it would work, but I have not verified the "provenance".

I won't post it up here in case of possible copyright issues, but I will email a PDF to anyone here who wants it and PMs me with their email address, for purely educational purposes, of course!

Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 19, 2009, 12:57:42 AM
I'm trying to keep it as simple and cheap as possible while still having something that will provide usable data.  Right now I'm at the sensor, one dual op-amp, 4 resistors, and a pot.  If the zero floats around with changes in supply voltage (it will be running off vehicle battery) I'll toss in a 78LXX regulator.  I'm basically using a reference design (with a couple of tweaks) from the chip manufacturers app notes.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 23, 2009, 05:38:23 PM
I had a little time today to finish assembling a more portable prototype based on what I had breadboarded.  It's probably been 20 years since I've did anything like this and was surprised I had it wired correctly on the first try!  All I was able to do was power it up, zero it, and test the ports with the Mity-Vac.  Probably I'll have time to hook it up to a running bike next weekend.

Pardon my depth of field issues while I'm still getting used to a macro-zoom lens...  :P

Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 23, 2009, 07:55:04 PM
And the initial test circuit...

Oops!  I just saw after posting I have the + and - switched on the op-amp inputs...  :-[
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: weasel01 on August 24, 2009, 05:19:29 PM
Justin looks good! Have you tested it yet????
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: nhmaf on August 24, 2009, 09:56:18 PM
To help reduce the  noise from the bike ignition affecting the amplifier's power supply rail I'd suggest that you put a 10 uF or bit bigger, 16V electrolytic capacitor where the +12V and GND come onto the board, and put a smaller, ceramic capacitor, say around 100nF (0.1uF) right next to the op amp chip (keep the legs/traces of the capacitor close or directly soldered to the power and GND pins.   You may need to do more filtering types of signal/power filtering, but this should help reduce some of the "high freq hairy-ness" you'll observe on the op amp's outputs and is good practice.   The MC33272 is a pretty good choice for this type of application, too !

You've got to come up with some sort of catchy name for it, too -
like "JEB" (for Justin's Electronic carb Balancer", or maybe "Bowser-1" or...
 ;)
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 25, 2009, 11:23:17 AM
I had thought about a small electrolytic to smooth out the DC, we'll see how this goes.  Another dangerous idea would be to take the sensor and mate it to a continuous little LED bar graph display up in the fairing or on handlebars.  I remember Edlebrock markets (or used to) a display unit that gave an air/fuel ration readout...
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 30, 2009, 09:33:24 AM
OK, first real-world test!!

I hooked up the "Gizmo" to my '81 R100 and tweaked idle and off-idle to get a pretty good null reading.  My idle had pretty much been right on but off-idle was off so I messed with the throttle cables until I got it where I wanted it.  My part throttle running was noticeably smoother.

I then hooked up my mercury manometer to check and I was within less than an inch Hg so I finished tweaking with the manometer hooked up.

I have determined that my difference is likely due to the "zero" shifting around with the fluctuating supply voltage found in a running vehicle as Mike had foreseen.  I think if I add a small electrolytic, a load resistor, and a regulator to the circuit this should stabilize the supply voltage and allow me to get a very good sync.

This also leads me to my next hair-brained scheme and that being to turn this into a product that stays on the bike at all times.  I envision this "little black box" residing under the seat somewhere and a small "dashboard" unit with an LED bargraph to allow somebody to constantly monitor their state of sync and tweak as desired.  I need to find about a 7 segmented bargraph array with segment 4 being a different color than the rest.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Bengt_Phorqs on August 31, 2009, 09:12:00 AM
Want to check this out on my R90/6 in the next week or so?  I just rebuilt the carbs and using the home-built manometer have them close enough for guvmint work but still a bit off.  I'll be coming to pick up my hat anyhow, so I'll be glad to let you experiment with your In-Sync-erator.   :)
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on August 31, 2009, 09:34:25 AM
We can see how it does, maybe use a separate voltage source as I doubt I'll have the circuit "enhancements" done by then.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Semper Gumby on September 10, 2009, 10:31:27 PM
hey Justin,

I once saw a FM tuner that had two LED (same color) for signal tuning.  When the signal centered both LED were full bright.  As one side dropped off it got dimmer.  Same for the other side.  Simple way to do the carb balance.  When both LEDs full bright = carbs in sync.

good luck.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Bob_Roller on September 12, 2009, 12:50:29 PM
Saw this item on the Bing Agency website, finally found out a little more about the Synchromate II  .

http://www.synchromate.com/index.php

Kinda sorta looks like what you're trying to build .
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: Justin B. on September 13, 2009, 08:44:54 PM
Theory is the same...  I think I've decided to morph it into something somebody can leave hooked up all of the time and have a little box up on the bars with an indicator so they can continuously monitor their state of sync. and tune accordingly.
Title: Re: Let the breadboarding begin...
Post by: wa1udg on August 18, 2011, 01:06:06 PM
I like that "FROG 7"