The New And Improved Unofficial R65 Forum V2

Technical Discussion => BMW Technical Q&A, Primarily R65 => Topic started by: Julio A. on February 12, 2011, 06:36:05 AM

Title: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Julio A. on February 12, 2011, 06:36:05 AM
I get oil my the shifter pad on my boots every time I ride the R65. Oil is coming from the tube that connects the carburetor to the air box. Isn't the tubes supposed to be airtight? Why does oil come out from there?
Can I at least directly route the crankcase breather hose so that it would expel oil out of the bike? I do think that since it is originally connected to the air intake, oil vapors gets sucked right out.
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Bob_Roller on February 12, 2011, 07:10:07 AM
It's not uncommon to get oil from the left side of the intake and carb .

Not quite sure why the left side seems to do it more than the right .

The breather hoses connect to the rubber air horns in the air box on the '81 model year and later bikes .

Some members here run the oil level lower than full on the dipstick, that seems to help .

Rob Valdez has installed a hose and filter to the breather and it doesn't go through the intake system .

I don't get the drops of oil on the garage floor anymore and the accumulation of oil in the bottom of the air box is greatly reduced .

I tried a method that I read about in the Airheads Beemer Club monthly newsletter about 12 years ago .

All it required you to do, was to remove the crankcase breather housing and put a small portion of a coarse copper pot scrub pad in the housing .

The theory was that there is a lot of atomized oil in the air coming out of the breather, the pad gives it something to collect on and get returned to the oil sump .
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Lucky_Lou on February 12, 2011, 01:55:29 PM
Is the breather valve working properly? could be sticking open.
Lou
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Rob Valdez 79 R65 on February 12, 2011, 04:32:53 PM
Bob's is a very good solution if you want to keep a stock appearance without a lot of extra work and expense.

With any solution, keep the oil level at the halfway point between the marks on the dipstick.
That is where I fill mine to when I perform an oil change.

Here are some pictures showing what I did: http://www.pbase.com/tomfarr/crankcase_breather
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Julio A. on February 13, 2011, 12:54:06 AM
Sorry for the ignorance, but what does the breather valve look like and where is it located?  ;D

I did fill oil only halfway to prevent this from happening, I'll look into the valve and put some pot scrubber on the breather housing while i'm in there.

Isn't there any chance of the pot scrubber getting sucked in?  :D
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Rob Valdez 79 R65 on February 13, 2011, 02:45:08 AM
You need to remove the airbox, and the starter cover, to get to it.

It is located at the right-rear corner of the crankcase, on top, by the starter motor.

(https://bmwr65.org/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbase.com%2Ftomfarr%2Fimage%2F132487403%2Fmedium.jpg&hash=a6c67b2bd0e907fa28e912934b972ba19ec3af11) (http://www.pbase.com/tomfarr/image/132487403/original)
click for really large

You have to remove the two socket-head screws on either side of it, and then pull off the lid.
Or maybe you just stuff the pot-scrubber material down the hole after removing the rubber hose?
Bob Roller will have the answer to that.

If you remove the cover, there is a good chance you will need to replace the paper gasket, because you might tear it in the removal.
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Barry on February 13, 2011, 04:04:53 AM
Another picture of the breather location taken from the RH side of the engine with the domed breather cover removed. This is the early disk type breather. You may have the later reed type but the location is the same.(http://)
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Rob Valdez 79 R65 on February 13, 2011, 04:39:35 AM
Can you get the starter cover off without disturbing the [clamshell-type] airbox?  I've never tried, before.
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Barry on February 13, 2011, 05:44:05 AM
Quote
Can you get the starter cover off without disturbing the [clamshell-type] airbox?  

Yes - It's perhaps not the way its supposed to be done but that's how I did it in the picture. Saves disturbing the choke lever and struggling with those breather hoses which are a tight fit in the air filter covers. Obviously tank has to come off and can't remember if I had to remove one or both of the ignition coils to provide some clearance.
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: montmil on February 13, 2011, 08:17:49 AM
The small, convoluted breather hose often cracks with age and can be a contributing factor to unwanted oil drips n' mess.

The replacement part from BMW is outrageously priced -leading many airhead owners owners to employ RTV sealant as a stop gap measure. Motobins has a repop hose for coffee money... that is, if you daily imbibe in the $5.00 frappuccino at Starbucks.

Monte
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Julio A. on February 13, 2011, 08:57:35 AM
My Breather hose is already in a very poor state. I just can't replace it since it has this unusual bend that I just can't seem to replicate with any kind of fuel hose.

The poor state of my breather hose does explain the collection of oil around the airbox and starter cover.


Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Bob_Roller on February 13, 2011, 10:32:02 AM
The breather hose is available from BMW, like you stated, you can't get a fuel or heater hose to fit and make the bends it needs to .

If you need the part number for the OEM hose, just say so, as the picture in the parts catalog is very misleading .
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Julio A. on February 14, 2011, 05:21:06 AM
Oh yes please. I'd appreciate the part number very much. I think that could be the only part I could afford to buy brand new from a BMW source.  ;D
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Julio A. on February 14, 2011, 09:11:05 AM
I tried to look for the part in realoem.com but to no avail.
Instead, I found this part.

Any one knows what it is? Parts 5 and 6.
(https://bmwr65.org/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frealoem.com%2Fbmw%2Fdiagrams%2Fh%2Fm%2F3.png&hash=d23dfe49ade276f69f8e5233b2354a21eb438437)
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: montmil on February 14, 2011, 10:13:37 AM
You're looking at the Air Injection system created by BMW to meet the California Air Resource Board (CARB) requirements. Had to do it to sell scoots to the poor folks in California ;)

These systems on my '81 and '83 R65s are now somewhere in the local landfill. Perfect place to reside.

Believe it's #10 that you're interested in? Motobins has them,

http://www.realoem.com/bmw/showparts.do?model=0364&mospid=51897&btnr=11_1712&hg=11&fg=10

Monte
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Bob_Roller on February 14, 2011, 05:58:22 PM
Here's the page from RealOEM .

The hose is item # 10 .

Like I said, the illustration looks nothing like the part !!

http://www.realoem.com/bmw/showparts.do?model=0364&mospid=51897&btnr=11_1712&hg=11&fg=10

Here's a link to the Motobins page .

http://www.motobins.co.uk/displayfinal.php?q=11430&go=GO
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Rob Valdez 79 R65 on February 15, 2011, 12:02:06 AM
Here are a couple of home-made catch-tank solutions.  

This one is fairly typical, although I've never seen one so open to the elements:

(https://bmwr65.org/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbase.com%2Ftomfarr%2Fimage%2F132542275%2Foriginal.jpg&hash=3bb5b44332b8d6490f17281318efd7dab4acbe87)

This one is VERY clever!  Notice the large tube coming out of the starter cover, going down to the frame rail, where it connects with a rectangular box with a vent:

(https://bmwr65.org/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbase.com%2Ftomfarr%2Fimage%2F132542276%2Foriginal.jpg&hash=881e60140c040f1535d49837ac24982af888364f)

Photos courtesy of the German airhead forum, http://2-ventiler.de/
If you don't read German, good luck navigating their photo gallery!  I just happened to stumble across these in their random pictures that show up on the left side of the gallery pages.

Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: larstorders on February 17, 2011, 01:41:25 PM
Avoid oil seepage from the left hand carburetor by simply directing the crankcase breather pipe into the right carb ONLY.
 No kidding it's works for me (on a 1982 light flywheel a 1981 R65). I did  replace the pipe in the airbox with one the same diameter as that which leads from the breather valve to feed into the right carb ( reducing any risk of increased back pressure). Good luck
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Rob Valdez 79 R65 on February 17, 2011, 04:04:21 PM
Quote
Avoid oil seepage from the left hand carburetor by simply directing the crankcase breather pipe into the right carb ONLY.
 No kidding it's works for me (on a 1982 light flywheel a 1981 R65). I did  replace the pipe in the airbox with one the same diameter as that which leads from the breather valve to feed into the right carb ( reducing any risk of increased back pressure). Good luck
Huckys (and others) sells the OEM tube for the earlier bikes that did, indeed, feed only to the right carb.

(https://bmwr65.org/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bmwhucky.com%2F0075pictures%2F007511%2F11151338215.jpg&hash=c06b0c33127b8bd5b58ef59bb8c0a0e6045c69fc)

 11 15 1 338 215  $10 USD

http://www.bmwhucky.com/007511.html

Half-way down the page.
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: steven m on February 23, 2011, 11:45:36 AM
I just want to understand this, since after reading this post, and finding oil on the toe of my left boot after riding, I was surprised to find oil on the bottom of the horn from the air cleaner to my left carb.  Is the point that BMW designed a bike that fills up the airbox with oil that migrates to the left carb horn, or is this an issue with a cracked breather hose?  As far as not filling up the crankcase of an air/oil cooled engine more than halfway to prevent this, that sounds more than a little odd.  Is the California exhaust air injection is causing a low pressure situation in the air box that is drawing oil up as vapor which then condenses in the airbox and runs down to the carb?  If that's the case, then all bikes with that blocked off shouldn't have this issue. right?  Don't the later R65's have a reed valve crankcase breather?  That could add to this issue as the oil vapor does not have the opportunity to condense and return to the engine.  I ran a couple of long clear hoses from the breathers of a hot rod Honda 750  to the tail of the bike, GP style, which gave enough length for the pulsing engine pressure to dissipate without any oil gathering or leaking.  Wouldn't a long tube to the back of the bike, with the breather valve removed, allow the engine to vent properly?
Sorry for the length of this post but I'm curious to get to the bottom of the issue.  And keep my bike and boots clean!
Steve    
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Barry on February 23, 2011, 11:56:42 AM
Quote
As far as not filling up the crankcase of an air/oil cooled engine more than halfway to prevent this, that sounds more than a little odd.

The idea is that it increases crankcase volume which will be less pressurised as a result and the breather valve then gets an easier time. All engines have breathers and all vent a little oil but you have to bear in mind that an airhead is not like a four where two pistons are going up when the other two are coming down. Both going down together in a boxer is much more of a challenge for the breather especially if there is any piston blow by or the rear crank seal is leaking air in. The breather valve is actually intended to pump down the crankcase to a partial vacuum to limit pumping losses and if there was no blow by at all it would not vent oil vapour ... it's not a perfect world though. I like Bob's suggestion about giving the vapour something to condense on and will try it sometime.

The breather tubes should be centred in the carb inlet tubes on both sides, they shouldn't touch the sides the idea being that the oil passes through the carbs as a vapour but we all know it can condense in the tubes and leak on your boot especially in cold weather. I too would love to know why the left side is favoured with the oil even without use of the side stand. Some say you should rotate the tube clip so that the screw is on the top and then the oil will not leak from the joint.

Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Bob_Roller on February 23, 2011, 01:37:42 PM
There are two different methods on how the vent tubes get to the rubber air horns .

One is a plastic insert into the throat of the air horn where the outlet is centered in the horn the vent hose goes over the end of the plastic insert as it protrudes from the air horn .

The other, which I have on my '81, has the rubber vent tubes that snap into the air horn, without any insert in the air horn .

Here's a page from RealOEM .

http://www.realoem.com/bmw/showparts.do?model=0364&mospid=51897&btnr=11_1713&hg=11&fg=10



The plastic insert, what they call an extension, item # 17, was never installed on my bike .
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: steven m on February 24, 2011, 02:57:40 AM
I'm aware of the function of a crankcase breather, especially on a boxer engine or big twin.  Without a proper breather they would blow every seal and pump oil past the rings.  Triumphs have timed crankcase vents for just this reason.  Our airheads get more than half of their cooling from oil, and reducing the amount of oil is just not a good idea because it doesn't address the issue.  My bike is an 83 model year built 10/82 so I'm not sure which breather hose set-up it has, but both of them look like siphons to me.  I'll have to go and take a look.  If the breather on our bikes isn't valved at all, then replacing the hose that comes off the breather with a coiled line would effectively solve the problem by giving the length needed for the engine to vent and then allow the condensed oil to drain back into the block without any obstruction.  Like a hillbilly still.  Excess vapor can still go to the carbs without the tubes becoming oil tanks.  Or put a piece of coarse copper scrubbing pad like everyone else!

If I figure it out I'll post some photos.

Thanks for the input.
Steve

Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: Barry on February 24, 2011, 04:33:40 AM
Quote
Our airheads get more than half of their cooling from oil, and reducing the amount of oil is just not a good idea because it doesn't address the issue.

I understand where you are coming from here and you are right in principal. No one is saying we a have a perfect breather system so the reality is that most airhead owner run with the oil level half way between the max and min marks on the dipstick. In fact if you read the owner's manual carefully I think it says don't add oil until it gets to the min mark as if they were aware of the problem. Those who fit deep sumps will often say that it is an opportunity to increase crankcase volume rather than increase oil volume.

As for needing oil volume to cool certainly on an R100 or any airhead running in very arduous conditions. My own concern most of the time is getting the oil hot enough never having recorded a sump temperature higher than 80 - 90 deg C. If an airhead was running with hot oil all the time I think it would be more likely to pass through the carbs as vapour rather than condense so there would be less of a problem anyway.
Title: Re: Crankcase breather hose
Post by: steven m on February 24, 2011, 11:08:34 AM
I think we are in agreement.  My bike runs nice and cool on open roads, the faster the better, even on a hot day. It's when we shut off that the oil condenses and heads not back into the block but down the breather tubes towards the carbs.  So the oil on my boots isn't from that days ride but from the last one.  Time to clean out those tubes.  

My BMW car manual also suggests not adding oil until it drops to the minimum level but I think that is to keep owners from just dumping in a quart and over filling!